Monday, February 10, 2014

Paige Bier_February 10_The Decalogue

Midrash, an ancient commentary of Hebrew Scriptures, can be related to the Ten Commandments in order to understand how the medium challenges us to find meaning. The tradition of Midrash focuses on biblical texts in order for the individual to “focus on the deep meaning and look to a comparative meaning”. The purposes of these visual mediums are used for the audience to go beyond the text of these scripts and to be able to connect their own lives to the Ten Commandments. Specific visual mediums are used in Krystof Kieslowski’s film Decalogue to show the audience an individual interpretation of the Ten Commandments. The two separate Decalogue clips were a representation of one of the Ten Commandments.  The first clip displayed the first commandment: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” and the second clip displayed the sixth commandment: “Thou shalt not kill”.
            There are visuals used in the first Decalogue clip used as a symbol in order to bridge the gap of understanding of the first commandment. As said by Stanley Kubrick, he uses dramatic action in the story for the “audience to discover what’s really going on rather than being told”. In the first film, the little boy asks his Father, “What is death?” The father responds with a biological reference (“the heart stops pumping blood”) over a spiritual reference (relating to God, after-life, the soul, etc.). His Father is very stubborn and relies heavily in what can be calculated and measured; therefore, believing that he is always right and believing in no greater God. The visuals are used to form an emotional connection to the audience in order to convey the interpretation of the first commandment. The film destroys the arrogance of the Father and conveys, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” through the death of his little boy. Since the Father claimed his calculations were correct about the ice being strong enough to hold his son on the ice, the ice breaks proving that a greater God could only have corrupted these calculations. Relating back to Kubrick’s reflection on the Decalogue, “you never see the ideas coming and don’t realize until much later how profoundly they have reached your heart” can relate to the man who sits on the ice by the fire, without saying a word the entire film. The visual used in this situation is his emotion when he wipes a tear, and presents the question from the audience of whether or not he is a personification of God. Therefore, the purpose of Midrash is accomplished while the audience is left struggling to find the meaning behind these symbols to unravel the text of the first commandment.
Decalogue related to feeling by presenting emotion in the audience. Midrash was used to present such emotion. For example, in the second clip we viewed of the Decalogue that conveyed the meaning of the sixth commandment, mixed emotions were planted in the audience. When the main character mistreats most of the people he comes in contact with, the audience automatically believes he should get revenge. When the film shows the man murder the taxi driver, the way that they set up the scene with the taxi driver’s last words of  “child” and “wife” makes us feel sympathetic. The dramatic action of him killing the taxi driver with the rock allows the audience to feel sympathy for the taxi driver and hatred for the killer. Therefore, the emotions are installed by the way the action is presented. To go into more depth, if the man killed the taxi driver because he was in pain, dying from illness (with good intentions, knowing he would be happier in an after-life), we would view it differently than him killing him for no reason. In being faithful to the Ten Commandments, we automatically see killing as wrong, and later interpret it as a disloyalty to God and the Ten Commandments.  That is why Kieslowski says, “It very quickly became clear that these would be films about feelings and passions, because we knew that love, or the fear of death, or the pain caused by a needle-prick, are common to all people”. Meaning that Kieslowski was able to make the emotional connection because he knew the audience was familiar with the feelings of love, death, and pain.
In the second clip when the killer says, “They are all against me” and another man responds saying, “No, they are against what you did”, forced me to create a question. When do we draw the line for a bad deed to define a person as bad? Do you think one bad deed, such as murder, can define that person and their faith? Since the film allowed me to connect the Ten Commandments and how faithful my commitment is to God, I would say this film does work to contextualize and integrate the code into an individuals’ life. Both clips in the Decalogue related directly to one of the Ten Commandments, which automatically connected to my personal life, and my relationship with God. The purpose of life on Earth is to live for God and to worship Him above all of His creations. The ultimate meaning of eternity is conveyed through the Decalogue in relation to our faithful commitment to our relationship with God. This film displayed the affects of violating the Ten Commandments in order to convey life on Earth and its importance to your eternal journey.

Stanley Kubrick wrote the following in this regard in the the foreword to Kieslowski & Piesiewicz, Decalogue: The Ten Commandments, London: Faber & Faber, 1991, 

No comments:

Post a Comment